Commercialadvertisementwasoncethoughtofasatechniqueofthemarketerstoinformthepotentialbuyersabouttheavailabilityofcertainproducts.Itwasseenmoreasamediumtoinformthebuyersratherthanpersuadethemtobuy.Thepresent

更新时间:
问题描述:

Commercial advertisement was once thought of as a technique of the marketers to inform the potential buyers about the availability of certain products.It was seen more as a medium to inform the buyers rather than persuade them to buy.The present day marketers see advertisement as a medium to damage the image of their competitors and their products.This indeed,is an undesirable and an immoral practice.Instead of speaking about their own products,these marketers speak about the drawbacks (often without any basics) of the competing products.

People watching TV advertisements would notice that there has always been an advertisement war between the marketers of different consumer goods.A few such cases are given below.

1.Parachute Coconut Oil vs.V.V.D.Gold

Some time back,the producer of V.V.D Gold Coconut Oil claimed in their TV advertisement that only their products was superior and the one sold in blue colour bottles (the reference was to Parachute coconut oil) was suitable only for un-natural hair.

2.Tata Salt vs.Captain Cook

Tata salt was first iodised (碘处理) salt marketed by an Indian Company.It has been enjoying a good and steady market.Captain Cook,another producer of iodised salt,who entered the market later,had to adopt some strategy to get control of the market.The TV advertisement of Captain Cook stressed on‘Free flow'of their salt when transferred to a container.The producer of Tata Salt retaliated (报复) by saying that the claim of Captain Cook was a trick and those who were quality conscious should deal with it with caution.

3.Pepsi vs.Coco Cola

Coca Cola was selected as the official soft drink for the Wills World Cricket 1996.When the cricket series was on,the marketers of Pepsi constantly advertised on TV.Their advertisement gave the idea that the cricketers preferred only Pepsi and as a matter of fact there was nothing official about it.

4.Horlicks vs.Complan

Sometime back

谭松林回答:

  66.information;推理判断题.根据文章第一段,用对比的方式描述过去和现在商家在运用广告中的不同之处.根据第一段中的"Itwasseenmoreasamediumtoinformthebuyersratherthanpersuadethemtobuy.";故填information.

  67.competition.推理判断题.根据第一段中的"Thepresentdaymarketersseeadvertisementasamediumtodamagetheimageoftheircompetitorsandtheirproducts.";故填competition.

  68.misuse.推理判断题.根据第一段中的"Thisindeed,isanundesirableandanimmoralpractice."作答.

  69.Cases/Examples第二段统领三、四、五、六段的几个例子.根据第二段中的"Afewsuchcasesaregivenbelow."可知是举例;故填Cases/Examples.

  70.practice(s)第二段中的"Afewsuch casesaregivenbelow."统领下文,接下来举例说明了几家商家的错误的做法.

  71.match根据第三段中的"onlytheirproductswassuperior"作答.

  72.cautious/careful根据第四段中的"TheproducerofTataSaltretaliated(报复)bysayingthattheclaimofCaptainCookwasatrickandthosewhowerequalityconsciousshoulddealwithitwithcaution."作答.

  73.favorite根据第五段中的"TheiradvertisementgavetheideathatthecricketerspreferredonlyPepsi"作答.

  74.richer根据第六段中的"TheclaimofComplanwasthattheirbrand(whichaccordingtothemwasBrandC)hasahigher percentageofingredients(材料)comparedtoBrandH(referencewasnothingbuttoHorlicks)."作答.

  75.quality最后三段谈到了解决办法.根据倒数第二段中的"Anymarketershouldonlyspeakabouthisproducts"作答.